The single judge rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in a cheating/duplicate FIR case, holding it not to be a fit case after considering the submissions and the nature of accusation.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed; petitioner directed to approach the court below for regular bail at later stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL NO.13467 OF 2020
The Petitioner having been implicated in Jodapadar P.S. Case No.0142 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No.2849 of 2020 pending in the court learned S.D.J.M., Puri has filed this application for grant of anticipatory bail.
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Considering the submission, further keeping in view the nature of accusation as those emanate from the materials on record; I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.
It is needless to observe that when the occasion so arises, the court below shall consider the prayer for grant of regular bail to the Petitioner; all such developments which have taken place in the meantime would also be taken into account in their proper perspective.
Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
…………………..
D. Dash, J.
Aks
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present case constitutes a fit case for the grant of anticipatory bail given the nature of accusation and materials on record.
Petitioner
State
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
