The court declined to grant anticipatory bail but observed that the matter could be reconsidered if the Petitioner surrenders to the court and moves for bail within four weeks, allowing it to be disposed of expeditiously.
Petitioner directed to surrender within four weeks to move for regular bail; records to be made available at Petitioner's cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No.793 OF 2021
Considering the submissions made and keeping in view the nature of accusations, as also the surrounding circumstances; while being not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner, it is observed that in the event the Petitioner surrenders in the court in seisin of the case in connection with Chandanpur P.S. Case No.02 of 2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No.50 of 2021 on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Puri within four weeks hence and moves for his release on bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order and disposed of early in accordance with law so as to enable the Petitioner to approach the next higher forum during the course of the day in case necessity so arises. The case records be made available at the cost of the Petitioner.
The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules.
(D. Dash) Judge
Basu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner in connection with G.R. Case No.50 of 2020, Chandanpur P.S. Case No.02 of 2021.
Petitioner
State
Dash
Basu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
