The Court disposed of the writ petition without expressing an opinion on its merits, directing the opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation within three months and pass an appropriate order.
Direction to opposite party no. 4 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.7509 OF 2020
The matter is taken up through video conferencing. Heard Mr. P.K. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Senapati, learned Addl. Government Advocate.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties to disburse the differential dues as per office order dated 06.02.2019 within a stipulated time.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.4 vide Annexure-5 series and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time, to which learned Addl. Government Advocate has raised no objection.
Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.4 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5 series and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of authenticated/certified copy this order.
Ashok
…………….……………
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be disposed of without expressing opinion on the merits and directing the opposite party to consider the representation within a stipulated time.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ashok
Opposite Party No. 4
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
