The Supreme Court allowed this writ petition by holding that the petitioner, being in the same footing, is entitled to the benefits under Sarat Chandra Parida and directed the opposite parties to release the pension and pensionary benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 6732 of 2020
02. 13.05.2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has filed this application seeking direction to the opposite parties to release the pension and pensionary benefits in the light of the judgment rendered in Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of Odisha, 2015 (II) ILR-CUT 94.
As it appears, the issue involved in this case is analogous to W.P. (C) No.22316 of 2018. Therefore, in view of the reasons assigned in order dated 20.08.2019 passed in W.P.(C) No.22316 of 2018, this writ petition stands disposed of.
The petitioner having stood in the same footing is also entitled to the benefits at par with Sarat Chandra Parida (supra). Consequentially, the opposite parties are directed to extend the pensionary and other retiral benefits to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of communication/production of a certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.
…..…………………….. Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J.
Alok
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to release of pension and pensionary benefits analogous to the judgment in Sarat Chandra Parida
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of OdishaFollowed¶3
_Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of Odisha,_ 2015 (II) ILR-CUT 94 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Petitioner
The Opposite Parties
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
