This order restricts the scope to the petitioner's representation regarding G.P. disbursement. Without expressing opinion on merits, the Court directs the authority to decide the representation within three months.
Direct opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation under Annexure-9 and pass appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.9525 OF 2020
02 11.05.2020 Heard Mr. K.C. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State opposite parties.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party authority to sanction & disburse G.P. of Rs.2000/- in the corresponding scale of pay of Rs.5,200-20,200/- in P.B.-1 in favour of the petitioner from the date of his regularization as due and admissible with all consequential arrear financial benefits within a stipulated period.
In course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.3 vide Annexure-9 and direction be given to consider the same within a stipulated time, to which learned Additional Government Advocate has no objection.
In view of the aforesaid limited grievance of the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.3 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner under Annexure-9 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of authenticated/certified copy of this order.
…………….……………
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Alok
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to consider his representation for G.P. of Rs.2,000/-.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Petitioner
The State opposite parties
B. R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
