Ranjan Kumar Sahoo v. Biju Pattanaik National Steel Institute Savodaya Nagar
Case brief
What is this about?
16.10.2020 This matter is taken up through…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.26097 of 2020
Heard Mr.B.P.Satpathy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Looking to the limited request involved herein and as this Court finds, the representation of the petitioner involving the matter vide Annexure-6 series since pending consideration, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing the Director, Biju Patnaik National Steel Institute, Puri, opposite party no.1 to look into the grievance of the petitioner vide Annexure-6 series and take decision, as appropriate, taking into consideration the grounds raised in the writ petition and the documents taken in support of the same, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of one and half months from the date of communication of copy of this order so also copy of the writ petition by the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notification No.4587 dated 25.3.2020.
Biswanath Rath, J.
uks
2
3
4
5
Petitioner
Director, Biju Patnaik National Steel Institute, Puri
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court