Single judge disposed of a writ petition directed opposite party no.2 to submit a proposal for opening a Government Provident Fund (G.P.F.) Account in favour of the petitioners with opposite party no.3 within six weeks.
Direction to opposite party no.2 to submit a proposal before opposite party no.3 for opening a G.P.F. Account within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.21972 of 2020
2. 4.11.2020
This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate for opposite parties.
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite party no.2 to submit the proposal before opposite party no.3 for opening of G.P.F. Account.
Considering the limited nature of request involved herein, this Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to opposite party no.2 to look into the request of the petitioners and take appropriate action in the matter of submission of proposal before opposite party no.3 for opening of G.P.F. Account in favour of the petitioners, within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of a copy of this order by the petitioners.
Petitioners may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020.
.……………………..…
(Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the State is directed to submit a proposal for opening a G.P.F. Account in favour of the petitioners.
Whether the deadline for complying with the proposed direction is permissible.
How the soft copy of the order should be utilised by the petitioners.
Petitioners
Opposite Party no.2
Opposite Party no.3
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
