Dismissed
Taranisen Sahoo v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/131/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Writ Petition was set up as infructuous due to the efflux of time and the petitioner's superannuation, leading to its dismissal. No cause of action was held to survive.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No.131 of 2005
¶2
- 11.02.2020
¶3
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time and the petitioner has already superannuated in the meantime. Hence no cause of action survives in this Writ Petition to be adjudicated upon by this Court.
¶4
Accordingly the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
¶5
…..….………………… (Biswanath Rath, J.)
¶6
Ayas
Coram
AI extract
Biswanath Rath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court