The Court held that no proceeding to the High Court lies regarding the dispute. It directed the Registry to transfer the matter to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack for disposal after giving parties a hearing opportunity.
Registry directed to transfer the brief to Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack for disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. No.1360 of 2015 W.P.(C). No.10959 of 2004
6 10.02.2020 Hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counseled appearing for the opposite party no.2, this Court finds for the dispute involved herein, no proceeding to High Court will lie. In the circumstances and as the matter is maintainable before Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench Cuttack, Registry is directed to transfer the brief to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench Cuttack for its disposal giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.
�����������. BISWANATH RATH,J
sks
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to intervene in the dispute or if the matter lies exclusively with the Central Administrative Tribunal.
BISWANATH RATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
