Disposed

Subash Rana v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC1 May 2020WP(C)/10120/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner sought renewal of a PDS license. The Court directed the Sub-Collector to treat the petition as a representation and decide within two weeks after the lockdown. No specific acts, cases, or legal issues were adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Sub-Collector to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide on PDS license renewal within two weeks post-lockdown.

Subash Rana Vs State of Odisha — Orissa HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.P.(C) No.10120 of 2020

¶2

02. 01.05.2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶3

Petitioner has prayed for the following

¶4

relief:

¶5

“(i) To quash the impugned order issued vide order No.5721/FSCW dtd-12.03.2020 under Annexure-5 in so far as enclosing the name of the petitioner’s FPS bearing FPS Code No.1907P045 under Nimikheta G.P. of Chilika Block is concerned.

¶6

(ii) To direct the Opposite Party No.1 to exclude the name of the petitioners FPS from the impugned list prepared under Annexure-5 considering the fact that the petitioner has achieved 87.32% of Bio_Metric AADHAR Authenticated Transaction through E-PoS as per the report submitted by the concerned field officers, i.e. Opposite Party No.4 under Annexure-4.

¶7

(iii) To direct the Opposite Parties more particularly the Opposite Party No.3 to renew the PDS license of the petitioner under Nimikheta G.P. of Chilika Block for the year 2020-21 within a time framed by this Hon’ble Court.

¶8

(iv) To direct the Opposite Parties to allow the petitioner to continue as PDS Retailer of Nimikheta G.P. of Chilika Block in the district of Khordha for distribution of all the essential Commodities to the Ration Card Holders/beneficiaries.

¶9

And to pass such other order/orders. Direction/directions as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶10

And for this act of kindness, the

¶11

petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”

¶12

uks

¶13

¶14

Considering the allegation involved in this writ petition, this Court feels it appropriate directing the Sub-Collector, Khordha, Khurda, opposite party no.3 to treat the writ petition of the petitioner as representation and take a decision in the matter of renewal of PDS license concerned by taking appropriate decision within a period of two weeks after the lockdown is over.

¶15

Writ petition thus stands disposed of.

¶16

…....……………………… Biswanath Rath, J.

¶17

¶18

¶19

Subash Rana v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subash Rana v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopinath Biswal Vs State of Odisha

G.Prameela Vs Chairman,Indian Oil Corporation

Anirudha Das Vs State of Odisha

M/S.Sree Metaliks Ltd. Vs State of Odisha

Bhagaban Dash Vs State of Odisha

Dillip Kumar Pattnaik Vs State of Orissa