The court disposed of a review application by modifying a prior order dated 8.9.2020 to correct a clerical error regarding the number of persons mentioned in paragraph 4.
The order dated 8.9.2020 was modified to replace 'earlier' with 'the 10 persons as' in paragraph 4.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RVWPET No. 298 of 2020
conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Government Advocate.
This review application has been filed by the petitioners to review the order dated 8.9.2020 passed in W.P.(C) No. 20897 of 2020.
Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the order of this Court, we modify the order dated 8.9.2020 passed in W.P.(C) No. 20897 of 2020 to the extent that in the first line of paragraph-4 after the word earlier, the word “the” be replaced as “ 10 persons as”. The rest part of the order dated 8.9.2020 shall remain unaltered.
With the above modification the review application is disposed of.
ks
Due to COVID-19, the petitioners may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with the certified copies in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25.03.2020.
S.Panda,J.
2
S.Panda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
