Single judge disposed of the contempt petition without issuing notice. The parties were directed to work out the previous Court order within one month. Failure would be deemed a deliberate violation.
Petitioner directed to comply with order of 10.06.2020 within one month; failure to do so deemed deliberate violation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTC No.5074 of 2020
conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This contempt petition is filed alleging violation of this Court’s order dated 10.06.2020 passed in W.P.(C) No.13253 of 2020.
Considering the submissions made and as this Court finds, no purpose will be served in issuing notice in such matter, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the O.P.(s) to work out the direction of this Court dated 10.06.2020 passed in W.P.(C) No.13253 of 2020, if not worked out in the meantime, within a period of one month from the date of service of a copy of this order by the petitioner further provided there is no legal impediment otherwise. It is made clear that in the event the order of this Court is not worked out within the time stipulated hereinabove, it will be construed to be deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
Petitioner may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020.
……………………………. Biswanath Rath, J.
kcb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Contempt Petitioner violated the Court's order dated 10.06.2020.
Petitioner
O.P.
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
