A single judge dismissed a contempt petition filed for violation of a prior order by directing the opposite party to comply within one month, deeming a notice unnecessary. Failure to comply would be treated as deliberate violation.
Contempt petition disposed of; O.P. directed to comply with previous order within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTC No.5011 of 2020
conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This contempt petition is filed alleging violation of this Court’s order dated 04.11.2019 passed in W.P.(C) No.20722 of 2019.
Considering the submissions made and as this Court finds, no purpose will be served in issuing notice in such matter, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the O.P.(s) to work out the direction of this Court dated 04.11.2019 passed in W.P.(C) No.20722 of 2019, if not worked out in the meantime, within a period of one month from the date of service of a copy of this order by the petitioner further provided there is no legal impediment otherwise. It is made clear that in the event the order of this Court is not worked out within the time stipulated hereinabove, it will be construed to be deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
Petitioner may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020.
……………………………. Biswanath Rath, J.
kcb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue notice to the opposite party for the alleged violation of a previous order of this Court.
Petitioner
O.P.
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
