Hemsagar Sabar v. Sangramjit Nayak
Case brief
What is this about?
This court disposed of a contempt petition (NO.1100 of 2017) finding that the impugned order had already been complied with, leaving nothing to be decided.
This court disposed of a contempt petition (NO.1100 of 2017) finding that the impugned order had already been complied with, leaving nothing to be decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTC NO.1100 OF 2017
Conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
It is submitted that the order sought to be complied with has been complied with in the meantime.
In the circumstance, nothing survives to be decided in this contempt petition, which thus stands disposed of.
The petitioners may utilise the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notification No.4587 dated 25.3.2020.
…………………………
Biswanath Rath, J.
m
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court