The High Court of Orissa dismissed an interim application seeking an extension of time for surrender under ABLAPL No.9926 of 2020, holding that the ground stated in the petition was not convincing.
Extension of time for surrender rejected; interim application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.9926 of 2020
Baisnab Pradhan and others
…. Petitioners
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
30.09.2021
Order No.
I.A. No.144 of 2021
(S. Pujahari) Judge
DA
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for extension of time for surrender before the court below can be allowed.
Whether the stated ground for extension of time is convincing.
Baisnab Pradhan and others
State of Odisha
S. PUJARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
