Allowed

Ajay Jena @ Dhadia Samal @ Dhadia v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC17 Jul 2020ABLAPL/2861/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order granted an application for anticipatory bail to three petitioners facing custodial detention in an FIR alleging offences under various sections of the IPC, including grievous hurt and attempt to murder.

What did the court decide?

Direction that petitioners be released on bail upon arrest by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with one surety for a like amount and complying with standard bail conditions.

Ajay Jena @ Dhadia Samal @ Dhadia Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2020)

¶1

ABLAPL No. 2861 of 2020

¶2

1. Ajay Jena @ Dhadia Samal @ Dhadia

¶3

2. Ashok Kumar Jena

¶4

3. Saubhagya Kumar Jena @ Babuna @ Babuna Samal ……. Petitioners -Vrs.-

¶5

State of Odisha ……. Opp. Party

¶6

17.07.2020

¶7

This matter is taken up through video conferencing.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶9

This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Kumbharapada P.S. Case No. 54 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 442 of 2020 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Puri for alleged commission of offences under sections 341/323/324/ 307/294/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

Learned counsel for the State on instruction submitted that the sole injured Rakesh Barik has sustained a simple injury.

¶11

Considering such submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the ingredients of the offence under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code are not attracted against the petitioners and due to previous dispute between the parties, the case has been foisted, I am inclined to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that

¶12

in the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with one surety each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that they shall make themselves available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Investigating Officer.

¶13

Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

¶14

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶15

Urgent certified copy of this order is granted on proper application.

¶16

Ajay Jena @ Dhadia Samal @ Dhadia v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Jena @ Dhadia Samal @ Dhadia v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Mohanty @ Dilip Kumar Mohanty Vs State of Odisha

Arjun Kumar Swain Vs State of Odisha

Sankar Prasad Nayak Vs State of Odisha

Krushna Chandra Pal Vs State of Orissa

Ajit Kumbhar Vs State of Odisha

Ashok Kumar Das Vs State of Odisha