Allowed

Satosh Kumar Das v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC21 Jun 2019WP(C)/9996/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking directions to the School and Mass Education Department to disburse his differential arrear and current salary in the Trained Graduate Scale. The Court disposed of the petition by directing the department to consider the case under the ratio of Radharani Samal within four months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the opposite parties to consider the petitioner's case in the light of Radharani Samal judgment within four months.

Satosh Kumar Das Vs State of Odisha — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Orissa HC (2019)

¶1

W.P.(C) No.9996 of 2019

¶2

2 21.06.2019

¶3

Heard Mr. S. Pattanaik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Mohanty, learned Standing Counsel for School and Mass Education Department.

¶4

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for direction to opposite parties no.2 and 3 to take immediate steps to disburse his differential arrear salary as well as current monthly salary in Trained Graduate Scale of pay from the date of attaining the age of 48 years on the basis of School and Mass Education Department Resolution dated 18.02.2008 and letter No.6259 dated 16.04.2010 as well as letter No.1772 dated 11.01.2011 of Director, Secondary Education, Odisha and the rules framed thereunder within a stipulated period.

¶5

Mr. S. Pattanaik, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that similar question has already been adjudicated by the learned Single Judge in Radharani Samal vrs. State of Orissa , 2017(I) ILRCUT-546 which has been affirmed by the Division Bench of this Court by dismissing Writ Appeal No.176 of 2017 preferred by the State vide order dated 30.04.2019. Therefore, the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in Radharani Samal (supra).

¶6

Mr. B. Mohanty, learned Standing Counsel for School and Mass Education Department admits the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the

¶7

petitioner. He contended that direction may be issued to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of judgment passed by this Court in Radharani Samal (supra) which has been affirmed by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.04.2019 by dismissing Writ Appeal No.176 of 2017 preferred by the State.

¶8

Considering the contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the ratio decided by this Court in Radharani Samal (supra) as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of this order.

¶9

Urgent certified copy of this Court be granted on proper application.

¶10

…………………….… Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J

¶11

Ashok

Satosh Kumar Das v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satosh Kumar Das v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Seikh Abdul Rajak Vs State

Smt.Suprava Panda Vs State

Subash Chandra Jena Vs State of Orissa

Sk.Sanaulla Vs Sandip Tripathi

Malati Panda Vs Ratnakar Rout

Parameswar Mahanta Vs B.K.Rao Patnaik