A writ petition was dismissed in default. The observing court noted that despite a directive to serve notice on opposite parties years ago, requisites were not filed, leading to a delay of over 15 years, deeming it inappropriate to issue notice now.
Writ petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.9943 of 2003
It appears that though notice was directed to be issued to opposite parties on 27.09.2004, the same could not be issued due to non-filing of requisites and in the meantime, more than 15 years have elapsed. Therefore, it will not be appropriate to issue notice now after 15 years.
Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for
default.
.…….......………………
( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
…………………..……… (K.R.Mohapatra) Judge
MP
Petitioner
Respondent/Other Opposite Parties
K.S. Jhaveri
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
