This single-paragraph order disposes of W.P.(C) No.7245 of 2012. The court dismissed the writ application as the petitioner submitted no instruction was available to press the matter at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.7245 of 2012
During Course of hearing Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction in the matter and, accordingly, he does not want to press this writ application.
Considering the submissions made, this writ application is dismissed as not pressed.
…………………….….…..
Biswajit Mohanty,J.
Petitioner
Opposite party No.1
Opposite party No.2
Biswajit Mohanty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
