Taking into account that the attempt for additional evidence though has been made admittedly after discharge of such witness but looking to the contents through the additional evidence by way of affidavit, this Court finds, depriving of introduction of such materials will be amounting to prevent effective adjudication of the dispute involved therein. It is true that the attempt has been made by the husband after discharge of such witness but on acceptance of the additional affidavit, it also allows the adversary for cross examination involving the same having scope for the objection to the contents therein, but however subject to consideration for imposition of cost for causing delay. In such view of the matter, this Court finds, the reasons assigned in rejecting the application for acceptance of the additional evidence by way of affidavit is improper. It is, in this view of the matter and to avoid future complications, this Court while interfering with the impugned order dated 28.2.2017 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Puri in C.P. No.195 of 2016 vide Annexure-6, sets aside the same and directs the Judge, Family Court, Puri to accept the additional evidence and do the needful. This order is however passed subject to award of cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only) on the husband, which will be paid to the wife on 10th of December, 2019, on which date both the parties are directed to remain present before the learned Judge, Family Court, Puri
