The petitioner failed to appear, and the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution after earlier adjournments due to absence.
None granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.22768 of 2018
5 19.06.2019
None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. Perused the record. It appears that earlier on 06.03.2019, 22.04.2019 and 15.05.2019, none also appeared for the petitioner. Accordingly, this Court suo mottu adjourned the matter. It is presumed that the petitioner is no more interested to pursue the matter. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant further adjournment. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
…………………….… Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J
Alok
Petitioner
Respondent
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
