Kalyani Ojha v. the Collector,Ctc
Case brief
What is this about?
Null
What did the court decide?
None. Petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
W.P.(C) No.21744 OF 2018
03 10.07.2019
None appears for the petitioners at the time of call. Heard Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Additional Government Advocate.
Perused the record. The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking for direction to opposite party no.4 to consider their residence certificate and allow them to participate in the selection procedure pursuant to advertisement issued in Annexure-1 dated 03.12.2018.
Since the selection process pursuant to advertisement issued in Annexure-1 dated 03.12.2018 has already been over, by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same is disposed of as infructuous.
…………….……………
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Alok
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioners
- respondent
Opposite Party No.4
Coram
B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court