This single-judge high court disposed of a writ petition by directing the branch manager of UCO Bank to decide a pending representation from the petitioner within two months via a reasoned order.
Directed Opposite Party No.2 to dispose of the petition's representation within two months via reasoned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 17405 of 2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
The petitioner is stated to have filed a representation before the Branch Manager, UCO Bank TTPS, (Opposite Party No.2) vide Annexure-2 for redressal of his grievance. The said representation is stated to be pending.
Taking into consideration the facts and submission and without going into the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Branch Manager, UCO Bank TTPS, (Opposite Party No.2) to dispose of the representation of the petitioner vide Annexure-2 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order by passing a reasoned order.
The petitioner is directed to supply the copy of the writ petition containing all the annexures to Opposite Party No.2 along with a certified copy of this order for convenience and reference to Annexure-2.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
Balaram
………………………. C.R. Dash, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the writ petition pending on the representation filed by the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Branch Manager, UCO Bank TTPS
C. R. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
