Maguni Ch.Pradhan v. State and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Supreme Court disposed of a writ petition filed by unknown petitioner, stating that owing to the efflux of time, the application has become infructuous.
The Supreme Court disposed of a writ petition filed by unknown petitioner, stating that owing to the efflux of time, the application has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(C) No. 17353 of 2013
Learned counsel for the parties state that by efflux of time the writ application has become infructuous.
In view of such submission, the writ application stands disposed of as infructuous.
…………….………………
DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.
GDS
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court