Reena Thapa v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
None appears for the petitioner at the time…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 15074 of 2009
None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. In compliance of the order dated 09.01.2017, Mr. D.K. Pani, learned Addl. Standing Counsel on instruction states that the marriage certificate issued in Annexure-2 in favour of the petitioner is genuine.
Since none is there to prosecute the case, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Ashok
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court