Madhabananda Dhal v. Gobinda Ch.Dhal
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear, indicated long delay, and appeared to have no interest in the matter.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear, indicated long delay, and appeared to have no interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.13516 of 2008
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time of call.
This Writ Petition has been filed in the year 2008. This matter is pending since long. It appears, the petitioner has no interest in the matter.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
…….………………… (Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
Petitioner
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court