In a matter concerning a contractual dispute regarding extra work between the petitioner and the State, the court declined to grant relief, directing the petitioner to seek redressal under the agreement or common law.
None granted. Petitioner directed to seek redressal under agreement or common law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) NO.11856 of 2019
Heard.
As this is a contractual matter between the petitioner and the State and there is some dispute regarding the extra work done by the petitioner, the petitioner, if so advised, may resort to redressal of grievance in accordance with the terms of the agreement or under the common law whichever is applicable.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ application is disposed of.
………………………….
Subha
C.R. Dash, J.
1 issue framed by the court
whether the court can adjudicate a contractual dispute regarding extra work done between the petitioner and the State
Petitioner
State
C.R. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
