Bhanumati Behura v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
26.07.2019 I.A. No.9639 of 2019 Heard…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.11084 of 2019
3. 26.07.2019
I.A. No.9639 of 2019
Heard learned counsel for the
parties.
The expression with regard to the words “Sub-Registrar, Pottangi in the district of Koraput-opposite party no.4” typed in the 6th & 7th line of the second paragraph of the order dated 3.07.2019 stands corrected and be read as “Sub-Registrar, Salipur in the district of Cuttack-opposite party no.2”. The other part of the order dated 3.07.2019 remains unaltered.
The I.A. stands disposed of accordingly.
Certified copy of the order dated 3.07.2019 submitted before this Court be returned after making necessary correction.
.…………………..…
(Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court