Dismissed
Hota'S Studio v. Union of India.
Orissa HCWP(C)/11016/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time following a filed memo, with connected miscellaneous cases also dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed; connected miscellaneous cases dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No.11016 of 2006
¶2
- 05.12.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time the matter has become infructuous. A memo filed to that effect is taken on record.
¶3
In view of such submission made and keeping in view the memo filed, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
¶4
All connected Misc. Case(s)/I.A.(s), if any is/are accordingly dismissed.
¶5
.…….......………………
¶6
( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
¶7
…………………..……… (K.R.Mohapatra) Judge
¶8
MP
Coram
AI extract
K.S. Jhaveri
K.R. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court