Dismissed
Gadadhar Panda v. Chakradhar Panda
Orissa HCWA/8/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This single-paragraph order dismisses a writ appeal as infructuous due to efflux of time without providing substantive reasoning or grounds.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.A. No.8 of 2005
¶2
- 30.07.2019
¶3
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that by efflux of time, this writ appeal has become infructuous.
¶4
Considering the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the appellants, this writ appeal stands dismissed being infructuous.
¶5
Misc. Cases/I.As. connected to the appeal, if any, are dismissed accordingly.
¶6
.…….......………………
¶7
( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
¶8
…………………..……… (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
¶9
SKG
Coram
AI extract
K.S. Jhaveri
K.R. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court