Baripada Shoes v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner prayed for withdrawal of STREV No. 155 of 2007 citing efflux of time. The prayer was allowed, and the special leave petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for withdrawal of STREV No. 155 of 2007 was allowed and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
STREV No. 155 of 2007
- 20.11.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner, by way of filing a memo today, prays for withdrawal of this STREV stating therein that by efflux of time the petition has become infructuous.
The memo is taken on record.
Prayer for withdrawal is allowed.
The STREV is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
.…….......……………… ( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
…………………..……… ( K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
AD
Coram
K.S. Jhaveri
K.R. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court