D.R.M.,S.E.Railway v. Smt.Nookala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order. The Court held the petition academic due to a prior stay and disposal by efflux of time, dismissing the writ.
Petitioners challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order. The Court held the petition academic due to a prior stay and disposal by efflux of time, dismissing the writ.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.J.C. No.17074 of 1997
By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 27.05.1997 at Annexure-2 passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in Original Application No.390 of 1993.
It appears that this Court on 23.11.1998 while issuing notice stayed the impugned order. It seems that by efflux of time, this writ petition has become academic.
In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of.
Misc. Case(s)/I.A.(s) connected to the writ petition, if any, is/are also disposed of.
( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
……………….…….. ( K.R. Mohapatra ) Judge
SKG
K.S. Jhaveri
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court