Lalita Mahari v. Ramesh Chandra Mahari
Case brief
What is this about?
25.03.2019 Heard learned counsel for the…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RVWPET No.189 of 2018
2. 25.03.2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Considering the rival contentions of the parties and applying the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sow. Chandra Kanta & another versus Sheik Habib as reported in AIR 1975 SC 1500 , this Court finds, the Review application remains unentertainable. This Court further finds that this Review Petition has been filed by a different counsel other than the counsel appearing in the C.M.P. No.296 of 2018.
This Court observes, the review petition, in the circumstance, is not entertainable.
Accordingly, this Review Petition stands dismissed.
…….………………… (Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court