The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition filed by the Government of India, Ministry of Defence regarding an order confirming a Central Administrative Tribunal's direction for promoting an applicant. The Court held no case was made out for review.
Review petition and Interim Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RVWPET NO.151 OF 2018
04. 13.09.2019 RVWPET No.151 OF 2018 AND
I.A. No.313 of 2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
BP
2
step and reluctant resort to it is proper only where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallibility.
Accordingly the Review Petition is dismissed. The I.A. is disposed of as such.
S.Panda, J.
K.R.Mohapatra, J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a review petition is maintainable when no patent mistake or glaring omission is apparent on the face of the earlier reasoned order.
Whether the Government of India, Ministry of Defence is entitled to the review of the order in W.P.(C) No.6137 of 2018.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sow Chandra Kanta and another V. Sheik HabibReferred¶9
AIR 1975 SC 1500 · Who else cites this
Government of India, Ministry of Defence
Applicant
S. Panda
K. R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
