U.I.I.Co.Lotd. v. Ranjan Sahu

O.J.C. No.1938 of 2002

1. 19.11.2019

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties 1 to 3.

Affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner in Court today be kept on record.

This Writ Petition contains the following prayer:

“i) That your Lordships be pleased to admit the O.J.C. call for the records of MACT Case No.31/2000 in the in the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Keonjhar. ii) Issue Rule Nisi to the opposite parties to file show cause as to why the order as per Annexure-6 shall not be quashed. iii) In case no show cause is filed or insufficient cause was shown, Your Lordships be pleased to issue writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order as per Annexure-6. iv) Or be pleased to issue any other writ/writs or pass order/ orders as your Lordsips’ shall deem fit and proper;”

On his own submission, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition involves a challenge to the award of the Lok Adalat vide Annexure-2 and an application for recalling of the award was filed vide Annexure-5 and the same has been rejected by the order vide Annexure-6. The Writ Petition also involves a challenge to the rejection of the miscellaneous application at the instance of the Insurance Company by the M.A.C.T. Court.

Considering the above and looking to the nature of order vide Annexure-2 this Court finds, ultimately the order vide Annexue-2 becomes an award involving the M.A.C.T. Case No.31 of 2000. In the event, the petitioner was aggrieved by the award vide Annexure-2, nothing