Praveen Mohapatra v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
None appears for the petitioners at the time…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OJC No. 12085 of 1999
Heard Mr. B.Senapati, learned Addl. Government Advocate and perused the record.
The petitioners have filed this writ application seeking direction to the opposite parties for conducting detail enquiry about the entire process of selection and appointment of Danger Building Workers in the Ordinance Factory at Badmal in the district of Bolangir after disposal of OJC No. 15454 of 1997 and punish the persons responsible for the illegalities and irregularities in accordance with law.
Since none is there on behalf of the petitioners to prosecute, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
…………….……………
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
GDS
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court