Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S.Sonali Jewellers
Case brief
What is this about?
It appears from the Office Note that instead…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.T.A. No.176 of 2018
It appears from the Office Note that instead of “14.08.2019”, the date mentioned in order no.02 passed in this case has been wrongly typed out as “14.08.2018”.
We have gone through the aforesaid order. It appears that the aforesaid is a typographical mistake.
Hence, the date mentioned in order no.02 passed in this case i.e. “14.08.2018” be corrected as “14.08.2019”.
Rest part of the aforesaid order shall remain unaltered.
.……..........…………
( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
……………….…….. ( K.R. Mohapatra ) Judge
SKG
K.S. Jhaveri
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court