Purna Ch.Panigrahi v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision against an order taking cognizance of offences under IPC sections 294, 506, and 34 and issuing summons. Court found no illegality or impropriety.
What did the court decide?
Revision dismissed; no illegality found in impugned order.
What the court decided
CRLREV No.765 of 2010
- 29.07.2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This revision has been directed against an order dated 4.1.2010 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Paralakhemundi in G.R. Case No.343 of 2009.
Perusal of the impugned order reveals that chargesheet having been submitted against the petitioners for commission of offence under section 294/506/34 of the IPC, the court below, on going through the same and finding a prima facie case for commission of offence under section 294/506/34 of the IPC against the petitioners, has taken cognizance of those offences and issued summons to the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made and on going through the impugned order, this Court does not find any illegality or impropriety therein, so as to entertain this revision.
Accordingly, the revision stands dismissed.
The interim order dated 20.5.2010 passed by this
Court in Misc. Case No.1171 of 2010.
Issue urgent certified copy of this order on proper application.
D. Dash, J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was any illegality or impropriety in the impugned order taking cognizance of offences under the IPC and issuing summons.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State
Coram
D. Dash
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court