Leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the case presented by the complainant, the accused had taken a sum of Rs.73,000/- from the complainant in order to meet his urgent medical expenses and for that he had assured that on his failure to do so, he would either sale his plot of land in favour of the complainant or would pay market price of the land as would be prevailing at the time of repayment and in that connection, a cheque having been taken by the complainant from the accused worth Rs.7,70,000/-. He submits that in those facts and circumstances, the direction for payment of compensation of Rs.8,00,000/- by the accused to the complainant, as has been passed by the appellate court enhancing it from Rs.1,40,000/- as awarded by the trial court is highly disproportionate and that too without any reason whatsoever. He further submits that the appellate court is not right in imposing sentence of imprisonment for a period of six months without providing any such justification which had not been awarded by the trial court. He further submits that the accused has already deposited a sum of Rs.2,00.000/before this Court pursuant to the order dated 5.7.2017 and with much difficulty at the maximum, he would be able to arrange a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- more being allowed with some time. He submits that the accused has other social and financial liability and all his family
