Sujata Priyadarshini Panda v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision against an order rejecting discharge applications was disposed of as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
this revision stands disposed of as not pressed.
Revision against an order rejecting discharge applications was disposed of as not pressed.
this revision stands disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLREV NO.443 OF 2017
This revision has been directed against an order dated 26.04.2017 passed by the Presiding Officer, Special Court under SC&ST (PoA) Act, Cuttack in I.C.C. No.1 of 2016 rejecting the applications under section 245, Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioners for their discharge in the case, which is running for commission of offence under section 3(1)(x) S.C. & S.T. (PoA) Act.
Placing the affidavit filed by one Saroj Kanta Rana and Ragunath Sethi, who claim to be the victims in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this revision. He further submits that the case being posted to 19.12.2019 in the court below for further order; the petitioners as well as two victims as above named would appear therein for further needful in the matter.
In view of above submission, this revision stands disposed of as not pressed.
Interim order passed on 01.08.2017 does no more
survive.
Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules.
…………….……….
D. Dash, J.
H
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court