Manoj Mohanty v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
CRL.A. No.116 of 2013 was disposed of after granting the petitioner liberty to raise questions during charge consideration. The interim order in M.C. No.184 of 2013 dated 19.3.2013 was vacated.
What did the court decide?
Revision disposed with liberty to raise questions at time of consideration of charge; interim order of 19.3.2013 vacated.
What the court decided
CRLREV No.116 of 2013
- 12.07.2019
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this revision with liberty to raise all the questions, which are now raised in this revision at the time of consideration of charge.
Granting the liberty, as aforesaid, the CRLREV stands disposed of.
The interim order dated 19.3.2013 passed by this Court in M.C. No.184 of 2013 stands vacated.
D. Dash, J.
Basu
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
D. Dash
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court