In BLAPL No. 4264 of 2019, the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, Justice S.K. Sahoo, disposed of the matter by noting that the petitioner was already arrested in another case, rendering no order necessary.
No order passed as petitioner already arrested in another case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 4264 of 2019
Dilip Pradhan @ Dillip Pradhan @ Mitu
…. Petitioner
Mr.J. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opp. Party
Mrs. Susamarani Sahoo, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
Order No.
ORDER
13.05.2022
This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been arrested in connection with another case.
In view of such submission, no order requires to be passed in this case.
Copy of the order be communicated to the concerned Court for verification of the aforesaid statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
( S.K. Sahoo)
Judge
PKSahoo
Dilip Pradhan @ Dillip Pradhan @ Mitu
State of Odisha
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
