Siba Das v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCBLAPL/1325/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order merely corrects a typographical error in an office note by redoning '20' as '22'. It is devoid of any substantive legal reasoning or application of law.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
BLAPL No.1325 of 2019
¶2
- 16.05.2019 Perused the office note. In the order no.03, the date has been wrongly reflected as “20” instead of “22”. Since it is a typographical error, the letter “20” is scored out in red ink by me in Court and corrected as “22”.
¶3
…………………..
¶4
S. K. Sahoo, J.
¶5
RKM
¶6
2
¶7
3
¶8
4
¶9
5
¶10
6
Coram
AI extract
S. K. Sahoo J
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court