The court dismissed a second application for anticipatory bail filed by a petitioner implicated in a murder case, declining to reconsider the earlier decision based on the petitioner's role and surrounding circumstances.
The application for grant of anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No.2241 of 2019
03. 24.09.2019
This is the second journey of the petitioner, who has been implicated in Khurda Sadar P.S. Case No.74 of 2016 corresponding to G.R. Case No.542 of 2016 registered for alleged commission of offence under sections 302/34 of the IPC pending in the court of the learned S.D.J.M., Khurda in filing this application under section 438 Cr.P.C., has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
State counsel.
Considering the submissions made and keeping in view the role of the petitioner as said to have been played by him in relation to the incident as those emanate from the materials on record as well as the other surrounding circumstances; I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the ABLAPL is dismissed.
Basu
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be reconsidered given the petitioner's role in the incident.
Whether the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner
State
Basu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
