Umesh Choudhury v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge dismissed the pending writ petition for default. The petitioner was not present in court on the date of hearing, despite a previous grant of time.
What the court decided
W.P.(C) No. 305 of 2013
- 10.12.2018 None appears for the petitioner.
On 26.11.2018, on the request of the learned counsel
for the petitioner time was granted.
Today, by way of filing a memo, Mr. Y.S.P. Babu, learned counsel who was appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has taken the brief for him to engage some other lawyers and therefore the appearance of M/s. Milan Kanungo and others for the petitioner in the present case be deleted from the cause list.
The memo is taken on record. Office is directed to delete the name of M/s. Milan Kanungo and others from the cause list.
However, nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner. Hence this writ petition is dismissed for default.
.…….......………………
( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
AD
…………………..……… ( K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Petitioner
Coram
K.S. Jhaveri
K.R. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court