This writ petition seeks direction to grant retirement benefits like gratuity and earned leave dues. The Court did not decide on merits but directed the opposite party to decide on the petitioner's representation within three months.
Directing opposite party no.5 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 20487 of 2018
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to grant the retirement benefits such as, gratuity and earned leave dues within a stipulated time.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.5 vide Annexure-2, but no decision has yet been taken.
Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.5 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-2 and pass appropriate order within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.
Issue urgent copy as per Rules.
Alok
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent to be directed to place its decision within the stipulated time?
The Petitioner
Opposite Party no.5
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
