Shatendra Kumar Sharma v. RBI
Case brief
What is this about?
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.17405 of 2018
02. 28.11.2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was availed a loan from IndusInd Bank Ltd., opposite party no.2 to purchase TATA LPK. He has defaulted in payment of instalments amounting to Rs.3,00,000/- (Three lakhs). He further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the outstanding dues provided a reasonable time is given.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) by 15th December, 2018. Rest of the amount shall be paid in two installments by end of January, 2019. In addition to the same, the petitioner shall go on paying the current dues. After payment of first instalment, opposite party no.2 shall release the vehicle in favour of the petitioner. It is made clear that no further extension of time shall be given.
Since the petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, it is open to the opposite party no.2 to file an application for review/recall the order, if it so likes.
Dr.A.K.Rath, J.
BKB
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant relief to an appellant in a service tax appeal.
Whether the appellant was in default of payment of service tax.
Whether to direct the appellant to pay the outstanding service tax.
Petitioner
IndusInd Bank Ltd.
Dr. A.K. Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court