Utkal Ranjan Das v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In an abatement due to non-appearance, the Court noted that the Swechha Sevi Sikhya Sahayak scheme is abolished, rendering the relief sought untenable, and disposed of the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Relief sought by the petitioner could not be granted as the scheme is abolished; petition disposed.
What the court decided
W.P.(C) No. 10461 of 2006
- 13.12.2018 None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. Mr. B. Satpathy, learned Standing Counsel for School and Mass Education Department is present.
The petitioner has filed this application seeking for engagement as Swechha Sevi Sikhya Sahayak (SSS).
Mr. B. Satpathy, learned Standing Counsel for School and Mass Education Department submits that the scheme of Swechha Sevi Sikhya Sahayak (SSS) is abolished.
In that view of the matter, the relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Ajaya
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant relief for engagement as Swechha Sevi Sikhya Sahayak (SSS) when the scheme is abolished.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
School and Mass Education Department
Coram
Ajaya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court