Dismissed
Lalat Kishore Jena v. State
Orissa HCSA/355/2000
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as none appeared for appellants on the date of hearing. Order contains no substantive reasoning.
What did the court decide?
S.A. dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A. No.355 of 2000
¶2
- 11.7.2018 None appears for the appellants when the matter is called out.
¶3
On 09.07.2018 and 10.07.2018, none had appeared for the appellants. S.A. is dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶4
…………………. Dr.A.K. Rath, J.
¶5
uks
¶6
2
¶7
uks
¶8
uks 03.
¶9
5.7.2018
¶10
uks
¶11
3
¶12
uks
¶13
4
¶14
BK B
Coram
AI extract
Dr. A.K. Rath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court