Dismissed
State of Orissa v. Chitra Sahu
Orissa HCLAA/61/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
12.11.2018 12.11.2018 Misc. Case No.104 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
LAA No.61 of 2017
2. 12.11.2018
Misc. Case No.104 of 2017
In view of the resolution passed by the Orissa High Court Bar Association, lawyers have abstained from the Court work.
This misc. case has been filed seeking two months time to pay the deficit court fees from the date of filing of the application on 17.07.2017. Court fees have not been paid as yet. Time has already elapsed in the meantime. Therefore, the prayer made in this misc. case has lost its force.
Accordingly, this misc. case stands dismissed.
…….…………………
(Biswanath Rath, J.)
3. 12.11.2018
LAA No.61 of 2017
In view of the resolution passed by the Orissa High Court Bar Association, lawyers have abstained from the Court work.
For non-payment of the deficit Court Fees as yet and as there is sufficient loss of time in the meantime, this Land Acquisition Appeal is not maintainable.
Accordingly, this Land Acquisition Appeal stands dismissed.
…….…………………
(Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
2
Applicant
Respondent
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court